A roadmap for watershed management in Bhutan : (Record no. 8846)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 06491nam a22001697a 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20240425092130.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 210415b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number e-book
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Karma Tsering
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title A roadmap for watershed management in Bhutan :
Remainder of title from policy to practice /
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc Thimphu, Bhutan :
Name of publisher, distributor, etc Watershed Management Division,
Date of publication, distribution, etc 2011.
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent 77 p. :
Other physical details ill., tables, & images ;
Dimensions ----
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE
Bibliography, etc Includes bibliographical references.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc Watersheds are natural waterscape resulting from the combination of the hydrology and<br/>topography of the landscape with a human perspective. While they project different<br/>contexts under natural, political or demographic framework, watersheds are, nonetheless,<br/>ubiquitous units that can be seen as the physical foundation of our nation state. They are<br/>logical divisions or regions of the natural landscape, and for some purposes they are<br/>ultimately the best framework to use for management. The human perspective, in an effort<br/>to factor in his interests, imposes an additional dimension to this definition to extend it<br/>beyond the boundaries of the physical watershed. As a result, we are inclined to perceive<br/>watershed space as a domain that transcends physical delineation.<br/>Considering the historic transformation in the Bhutanese politics with power devolved to<br/>the people and authority decentralized to the local levels, the central government must<br/>stand up to the new roles and challenges posed in accommodating local-level, peopleoriented<br/>imperatives while being resolute in safeguarding and representing the overall<br/>interests of the general public and the nation as a whole. Realization of the four pillars of<br/>Gross National Happiness (GNH) is squarely anchored in the collective resolve of all citizens,<br/>researchers and scientists, resource managers and decision-makers to focus on a vision of<br/>sustained peace and prosperity through integration of ecological, sociocultural, economic<br/>and to environmental objectives. Adopting a watershed perspective to the whole<br/>development strategy can provide a balanced framework for effective integration across<br/>management systems and administrative levels.<br/>The watershed approach is one panacea with the real prospect of addressing coupled<br/>human, resource and environment related problems, in particular those related to water<br/>resources rapidly being exposed to competing demands. Most of the time, we get caught<br/>into the dichotomy of economic development and environment, and well-conceived<br/>participatory, integrated watershed management in the upper catchments may become an<br/>important tool. The watershed approach acknowledges linkages between upstream and<br/>downstream areas and between “Green” and “Blue” water, and reduces the risks of trading<br/>problems in space and time. Watershed management is an integrative way of thinking about<br/>various human activities that occur on a watershed that have effects on, or affected by,<br/>water. With this perspective, we can plan long-term, sustainable solutions to many natural<br/>resource problems, and find a better balance in fulfilling the current needs while leaving a<br/>sound resource legacy for generations to come.<br/>Watershed approach cannot be impressed through regulations, changes in law, more<br/>money or any normal bureaucratic measure; but through integrative and participatory<br/>actions. Watersheds constitute a coherent and systematic basis for deliberation and action<br/>in natural resource management as those constituents relate to each other with minimal<br/>scientific ambiguity within their natural boundaries. A single nationalized solution is unlikely<br/>to succeed in an environment as complex as the human-associated diversity, and these local<br/>variations are the key to the growing demand for local actions and solutions. Unfortunately,<br/>watershed science in general has not yet developed an effective interface between what we<br/>know and how we use that knowledge. Good science is not enough; we need useful science.<br/>As a result, watershed management is perceived to be both institutionally and scientifically<br/>A Roadmap for Watershed Management in Bhutan 2011<br/>W a t e r s h e d M a n a g e m e n t D i v i s i o n<br/>Page ES 2<br/>complex, and thus inherently difficult to implement. Given the benefit of recent advances in<br/>watershed science in terms of new knowledge and experience, we are offered with<br/>unprecedented opportunity to embark upon a program of synergizing environmental and<br/>sociocultural safeguards with economic and consumptive imperatives while fostering the<br/>natural resource potential.<br/>There are also challenges posed by the development pathway that the nation has cautiously<br/>chosen to tread. The proliferation of market-based economic activities have fueled<br/>accelerated demand for natural resources all too often leading to overexploitation and<br/>unsustainable practices. Problems associated with water scarcity, deforestation and land<br/>degradation are manifest. The urgency for achieving a watershed vision is related to both<br/>the need to protect an expanding network of major hydropower installations in the country<br/>and the relatively small but productive river valleys for improving food security situation of<br/>the largely agrarian-based rural communities. The approach envisioned is one of integrating<br/>watershed management practices with environmentally sound land-use management<br/>activities and effective community development efforts through comprehensive local<br/>institutional movement, emphasizing focus on best practices (Box 1).<br/>In 2009, the Watershed Management Division (WMD) was established under the<br/>Department of Forests and Park Services, and designated as national focal agency for<br/>operationalizing the watershed management program as a part of larger a initiative in<br/>developing integrated frameworks for major river basins in the country. In close<br/>consultation with managers, stakeholders and communities, WMD has developed three<br/>broad goals underpinning the common program objectives and practical measures<br/>contributing to the overall development vision of GNH by sustaining the flows of natural<br/>resources and better stewardship of watersheds. These goals and objectives are grounded<br/>in providing the country and its people with goods and services in ways that maintain the<br/>long-term productive capacity of natural resources without damaging the environment.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name as entry element 1. Watershed Management- Bhutan
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme
Koha item type E-Book
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
          College of Natural Resources College of Natural Resources 15/04/2021   e-book (SD) 15/04/2021 15/04/2021 E-Book

College of Natural Resources, Royal University of Bhutan | ©
Office: +975 02 376247 (Ext. 2004), E-mail: library.cnr@rub.edu.bt